A case of gross bank fraud against their customer, performed by the Danish bank Jyske Bank A/S for financial fraud and document false. And that the client's lawyer, Lundgren's Attorney's helped Jyske Banks Board of Directors, CEO Anders Christian Dam with damaging plaintiff's case. By not presented some of the Client's claims to the courts, in order to help the defendant Jyske bank A/S to disappoint in legal matters. Therefore, we believe that Jyske Bank A/S has actively bribed Lundgren's lawyer's business, in order not to present some of the client's claims in court. Meanwhile the Danish authorities, who were supposed to secure the legal security of the guarantor, look passively and let Jyske Bank continue the bank's obvious fraud. And leave the customer alone to stop the bank's continued crime. Please help us be taken seriously and share this call.
11-03-2020 “COPIES OF THE FIRST LETTERS.” HERE IS THE DRAFT AS WE PUT UP THE NEW FRONT PAGE, IS CONSTANTLY UPDATED, YOU GET COPIES OF LETTERS AND ATTACHMENTS IN HIGH QUALITY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE EEL CALL THE VICTIM OF JYSKE BANK’S FRAUD OPERATIONS ON +4522227713
See appendix we believe supports that Jyske bank in Denmark has paid return commission – bribe to Lundgren’s lawyers for not presenting some of our claims against Jyske Bank, English texts appear on all pictures that come much more, since it no longer only is a case of fraud as it is written in all emails and written to Lundgren’s lawyer partner company
By not presenting the client’s claims to the court.
The period during which Rödstenen and Lundgrens have countered their client’s case and claims, have been presented to the court, is during the period between February 2016 and until September 2019
Where the client is forced to fire Lundgren’s lawyers after discovering that Lundgrens, has worked for Jyske bank A/S in a 3 digit million trade. And therefore have been incompetent, and corrupt.
The client is compelled to present the final litigation, which is 28/10/2019
If you cannot understand Lundgrens or Rödstenen’s attorneys have not submitted the client’s claims, so you can ask.
Why the client should act as a lawyer himself, and make his final defense, as both Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen should be the client’s lawyer.
And probably to disappoint in legal matters neither Rödstenen nor Lundgrens, submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S.
If you cannot understand Lundgrens and Rödstenen’s attorneys, and why these law firms, directly against the client’s continuous instructions, have not presented any of the client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S.
When we look at all the inquiries to our attorneys, we look at the mails and letters, we have written since February 2016 to Rödstenen’s attorneys Thomas Schioldan Sørensen.
And to Lundgren’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen, until we fired them in September 2019.
It is clear that both law firms has had an financial interests with Jyske Bank A/S certainly with Board member Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager as between man.
We do not hide anything, and would like to talk about this here, therefore we play with open cards.
The question is whether there are some, who can trust the Danish banks as we here provide evidence of operating fraudulent bank, and deliberately lying, and conceal the truth.
If we are wrong why no one will talk to us at all. Don’t you see we actually want to have a dialogue with Jyske bank’s board of directors.
Call and +4522227713 And let’s meet as adults. And you just have to go through the case with us. If we are wrong then there is nothing we would rather do, than bring the case against Jyske bank for fraud and false.
And bring the chase out of court again because we don’t think this is hilarious.
Unless Lundgrens has not countered their client's case in being presented to court, we believe there is bribery.
The big question now is rather.
How much does Jyske Bank A / S have
Paid Lundgren's lawyers.
Not to submit any of our claims against Jyske Bank A / S.
Do we have a bribery case here?
-
The most common definition is: "a payment intended to cause someone to do something dishonest, illegal or contrary to his or her duties for the purpose of obtaining an unjustified benefit".
-
If this is not the case for Jyske Bank A / S active bribery, when the bank has offered, Lundgren's lawyer partner company to do a million work for Jyske Bank A / S
-
And if there is no passive bribery for Lundgrens Advokat partner company, accept a million assignment from Jyske bank A / S if the purpose is to override that our claims against Jyske Bank A / S are never presented.
-
WHAT IS THIS HERE
Pligt-forsømmelse,en. (jf. -forsømmende samt -forglemmelse; især emb.) undladelse af at gøre sin pligt; forsømmelse af ens pligter, navnlig: ens embedspligter
Viste Bestyrelsen ikke at Jyske bank A/S udsatte deres klient for bedrageri, da Lundgrens valgte at arbejde for Jyske Bank A/S
Bestyrelse MICHAEL ALSTRØM FORMAND / THOMAS KRÆMER BESTYRELSESMEDLEM NINA RINGEN / BESTYRELSESMEDLEM TOBIAS VIETH / BESTYRELSESMEDLEM NIELS WIVE KJÆRGAARD ADVOKAT (H)Direktør & Chief Operating Officer MARTIN KIRKEGAARD DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICERDan Terkildsen ADVOKATPARTNER EMAIL DAT@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2850 MOBIL 2811 9513Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen ADVOKATDIRECTOR EMAIL SLY@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2887 MOBIL 5356 2231Pernille Hellesøe TEAM ASSISTENT EMAIL PHT@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2963Emil Hald Winstrøm ADVOKATFULDMÆGTIG EMAIL EMW@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2892Mette Marie Nielsen ADVOKATFULDMÆGTIG EMAIL MMN@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2990 MOBIL 2524 5103Niels Gram-Hanssen ADVOKATPARTNER EMAIL NGH@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2919 MOBIL 2524 5119Perhaps Lundgren’s lawyers have not understood what the Client has clearly written. – 3.1 Lundgrens acts on the basis of and in accordance with the client’s instructions, and the client and Lundgrens regularly agree on the legal assistance and scope of the assignment as well as the client’s and others’ involvement. First Lundgren’s attorneys have not written anything that some of their clients’ fraud allegations against Jyske Bank are directly illegal, that is, in accordance with the provisions of the law to present to the court. Lundgrens writes they are entitled to refuse to comply with an instruction if this would violate legislation or other rules, e.g. rules of good practice. 2nd If it is against good practice for Lundgren’s lawyers to stop Jyske Bank’s fraud cases against Lundgren’s former client, then Lundgren’s lawyers have not written anything about it. Lundgrens it is for fun laughs Didn’t you like that Dan Terkildsen
Here are the first letters that Lundgrens did not want to answer.
Trying to put them in date order so you can follow, around allegations to be made and witnesses to be summoned, Lundgrens 100% counteracts their client here in the case in order to disappoint in legal matters.
Med mindre Lundgrens ikke har modarbejdet deres klients sag i at blive fremlagt for retten, mener vi der er om bestikkelse. Det store Spørgsmål er nu snarere. Hvor meget har Jyske Bank A/S Betalt Lundgrens advokater. For ikke at fremlægge en eneste af vores påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S. Har vi her med en bestikkelse sag at gøre ? – Den mest almindelige definition er:“en betaling, der har til formål at få nogen til at gøre noget, der er uærligt, ulovligt eller i strid med vedkommendes pligter med det formål at opnå en uberettiget fordel“. – Hvis ikke der er tale om for Jyske Bank A/S aktiv bestikkelse, når banken har tilbudt, Lundgrens advokat partnerselskab at lave et million arbejde for Jyske Bank A/S – Og hvis der ikke tale om passiv bestikkelse for Lundgrens Advokat partner selskab, tage imod en million opgave fra Jyske bank A/S, hvis formålet er at tilsidesætte at vores påstande imod Jyske Bank A/S aldrig bliver fremlagt. – HVAD ER DET HER SÅ FOR NOGET ?
