A case of gross bank fraud against their customer, performed by the Danish bank Jyske Bank A/S for financial fraud and document false. And that the client's lawyer, Lundgren's Attorney's helped Jyske Banks Board of Directors, CEO Anders Christian Dam with damaging plaintiff's case. By not presented some of the Client's claims to the courts, in order to help the defendant Jyske bank A/S to disappoint in legal matters. Therefore, we believe that Jyske Bank A/S has actively bribed Lundgren's lawyer's business, in order not to present some of the client's claims in court. Meanwhile the Danish authorities, who were supposed to secure the legal security of the guarantor, look passively and let Jyske Bank continue the bank's obvious fraud. And leave the customer alone to stop the bank's continued crime. Please help us be taken seriously and share this call.
11-03-2020 “COPIES OF THE FIRST LETTERS.” HERE IS THE DRAFT AS WE PUT UP THE NEW FRONT PAGE, IS CONSTANTLY UPDATED, YOU GET COPIES OF LETTERS AND ATTACHMENTS IN HIGH QUALITY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE EEL CALL THE VICTIM OF JYSKE BANK’S FRAUD OPERATIONS ON +4522227713
See appendix we believe supports that Jyske bank in Denmark has paid return commission – bribe to Lundgren’s lawyers for not presenting some of our claims against Jyske Bank, English texts appear on all pictures that come much more, since it no longer only is a case of fraud as it is written in all emails and written to Lundgren’s lawyer partner company
And probably to disappoint in legal matters neither Rödstenen nor Lundgrens, submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S.
If you cannot understand Lundgrens and Rödstenen’s attorneys, and why these law firms, directly against the client’s continuous instructions, have not presented any of the client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S.
If we are wrong why no one will talk to us at all. Don’t you see we actually want to have a dialogue with Jyske bank’s board of directors.
Call and +4522227713 And let’s meet as adults. And you just have to go through the case with us. If we are wrong then there is nothing we would rather do, than bring the case against Jyske bank for fraud and false.
And bring the chase out of court again because we don’t think this is hilarious.
Unless Lundgrens has not countered their client's case in being presented to court, we believe there is bribery.
The big question now is rather.
How much does Jyske Bank A / S have
Paid Lundgren's lawyers.
Not to submit any of our claims against Jyske Bank A / S.
Do we have a bribery case here?
The most common definition is: "a payment intended to cause someone to do something dishonest, illegal or contrary to his or her duties for the purpose of obtaining an unjustified benefit".
If this is not the case for Jyske Bank A / S active bribery, when the bank has offered, Lundgren's lawyer partner company to do a million work for Jyske Bank A / S
And if there is no passive bribery for Lundgrens Advokat partner company, accept a million assignment from Jyske bank A / S if the purpose is to override that our claims against Jyske Bank A / S are never presented.
WHAT IS THIS HERE
Pligt-forsømmelse,en. (jf. -forsømmende samt -forglemmelse; især emb.) undladelse af at gøre sin pligt; forsømmelse af ens pligter, navnlig: ens embedspligter
Viste Bestyrelsen ikke at Jyske bank A/S udsatte deres klient for bedrageri, da Lundgrens valgte at arbejde for Jyske Bank A/S
Here are the first letters that Lundgrens did not want to answer.
Trying to put them in date order so you can follow, around allegations to be made and witnesses to be summoned, Lundgrens 100% counteracts their client here in the case in order to disappoint in legal matters.